October 1, 2022
But let’s ask the key question: do ads make the ride better? No. They don’t.
They clutter the app, disrupt the focus on getting from A to B, and add zero value to the rider or driver experience. This isn’t innovation—it’s a cash grab.
User-Centric Design: Ads could offer relevant deals (e.g., destination promos), but they risk overwhelming users who value a streamlined app.
Market Fit: In-app advertising works elsewhere (e.g., Waze), though Uber’s focus on transportation may not naturally lend itself to discovery.
Entry Point: Uber’s captive audience is a huge asset; success depends on making ads feel native, like sponsored rides, rather than intrusive.
Technological Feasibility: Ad integration is technically simple, with the challenge lying in seamless design.
Behavioral Science: Riders prioritize efficiency—ads must be subtle to avoid irritation.
Economic Viability: It’s a lucrative play, potentially lowering ride costs or boosting margins with minimal overhead.
Innovation Driver: This is transaction-driven, chasing revenue rather than reimagining the user experience. It’s a smart tweak, not a bold vision.
User Impact: Riders want speed and simplicity—ads are an unwelcome distraction. Drivers, already stretched thin, might feel further squeezed by a company prioritizing revenue over their needs.
A Ticking Clock?: If Uber sees automated driving as an inevitable disruptor—rendering its human-driver model obsolete—this move makes sense. Ads could be a way to milk profits while they still can. But if they’ve given up on solving that challenge, it’s a white flag, not a strategy.
AT&T’s Echo: In 1992, AT&T’s “You Will” ads envisioned a connected future—video calls, navigation, remote work—all spot-on predictions. Yet, AT&T lacked the will to build it, losing ground to nimbler players. Is Uber in the same boat? Seeing autonomy’s threat but lacking the vision to fight back? For a company this young, it’s surprising—but with the founder gone, the shift to short-term thinking isn’t shocking.
Instead of ads, Uber could innovate to deepen market share. Picture a loyalty subscription, like airlines offer—ride enough, earn free upgrades (e.g., Uber Black rides) or priority booking. Focus on the customer experience—make the ride smoother, faster, more delightful—and the revenue will follow. Ads are a distraction from that mission.
This platform might pad Uber’s bottom line, but it’s a symptom of lost ambition. If Uber’s resigned to disruption, ads are logical. If not, they’re a misstep. Either way, they don’t make the ride better—and that’s the litmus test they’re failing.